Some Crim

Track the Untold Stories

John O'Keefe and Karen Read. (Images via BPD portrait and WBZ-TV screengrab, respectively.)

‘Crossed the line’: Judge rips Karen Read prosecutor for ‘poor judgment’ in issuing video statement but declines to kick office off case

John O&#8217Keefe and Karen Read through. (Photographs through BPD portrait and WBZ-Television screengrab, respectively.)

A judge final 7 days reported the prosecutor in the Karen Go through situation utilized &#8220inadequate judgment&#8221 in issuing a general public statement defending his circumstance but declined the defense ask for to take out the district legal professional&#8217s place of work from the demo.

Study is accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston law enforcement Officer John O&#8217Keefe, with her SUV when she dropped him off at a fellow cop&#8217s household in Canton, Massachusetts, early in the morning of Jan. 29, 2022, pursuing a night of ingesting. In the midst of a blizzard, Browse still left O&#8217Keefe to die, prosecutors allege. He was observed the next morning buried in snow and later pronounced lifeless. Her lawyers declare O&#8217Keefe built it into the cop&#8217s household that night time exactly where someone inside assaulted him and then dumped him outside in the snow to die which led to a broad conspiracy of legislation enforcement masking up the criminal offense.

Go through&#8217s lawyers requested Outstanding Court Decide Beverly J. Cannone to throw Norfolk County District Lawyer Michael Morrissey&#8217s workplace off the scenario since of a movie issued past August. In the video clip, Morrissey railed in opposition to the &#8220harassment of witnesses&#8221 in the situation. He mentioned the men and women who had been in the cop&#8217s home that night had been witnesses, not suspects as the protection contends.

Associated Coverage:

    &#8220These people have been not portion of a conspiracy and undoubtedly did not dedicate murder or any criminal offense that evening,&#8221 he said. &#8220They have been forthcoming with authorities, supplied statements, and have not engaged in any include-up … To have them accused of murder is outrageous.&#8221

    The protection has also tried to connect own interactions between the witnesses and law enforcement investigators, which include direct Det. Michael Proctor of the Massachusetts Condition Police. Morrissey reported Proctor experienced no near interactions to the witnesses and any &#8220recommendation to the contrary is a lie.&#8221

    Examine&#8217s attorneys accused Morrissey of violating the Massachusetts Principles of Specialist Conduct pertaining to pretrial publicity. The policies say, in component, that an attorney involved in a make a difference &#8220shall not make an extrajudicial statement&#8221 about a case that would have a &#8220significant chance of materially prejudicing an adjudicative continuing in the make a difference.&#8221 Specifically addressing prosecutors, the rules say they should &#8220refrain&#8221 from generating comments that could heighten &#8220public condemnation of the accused.&#8221

    Morrissey manufactured the statement days just after Read through&#8217s lawyer Alan Jackson went on ABC&#8217s Nightline to issue the finger at the witnesses in the scenario.

    Cannone took situation with both legal professionals&#8217 remarks in the media. She stated Jackson&#8217s statements about the witnesses potentially remaining murderers or associated in a conspiracy &#8220are the variety of extrajudicial statements that are extra very likely to have a prejudicial impact on the assertion.&#8221 Meanwhile, Morrissey&#8217s video assertion also pitfalls &#8220heightening the general public condemnation&#8221 of Read through.

    &#8220The contentions of the defendant in this regard are nontrivial,&#8221 Cannone wrote in the 11-site ruling.

    But Cannone dominated that a prosecutor must not be dismissed from a circumstance except the perform is &#8220egregious&#8221 and far too seriously affects the community fascination of &#8220bringing responsible people to justice.&#8221 Even now, some of Morrissey&#8217s reviews &#8220crossed the line&#8221 and have been in &#8220inadequate judgment,&#8221 Cannone wrote.

    Read through&#8217s protection also objected to the district lawyer&#8217s workplace disclosure that the U.S. Lawyer&#8217s Business office in November 2022 had started out its very own investigation, perhaps seeking into legislation enforcement misconduct. The investigation prompted Morrissey&#8217s business office to ship their federal counterparts a letter asking that they enable them know if any exculpatory facts was uncovered. Browse&#8217s attorneys accused the prosecutor of failing to notify them of the ongoing federal investigation for 6 months, violating proof disclosure procedures.

    The protection questioned the choose to dismiss the situation or disqualify the district lawyer&#8217s business office. On the other hand, Cannone also rejected the ask for, indicating although prosecutors knew about the investigation, they did not know the precise mother nature of it nor whether any new evidence was uncovered.

    Examine&#8217s trial is scheduled for April 16.

    Be part of the discussion 

    The post ‘Crossed the line’: Choose rips Karen Read through prosecutor for ‘poor judgment’ in issuing movie statement but declines to kick office off scenario initial appeared on Regulation & Criminal offense.